NHER 52228 (Cropmark and Earthwork record) - Cropmarks of enclosures and fields parallel to the Roman road running southwest from Caistor Roman town
The Norfolk Heritage Explorer is a filtered version of the Norfolk HER intended for casual research. Please contact us to consult the full record.
See also further guidance on using the Norfolk Heritage Explorer website.
Summary
Protected Status/Designation
- None recorded
Location
| Map sheet | TG20SW |
|---|---|
| Civil Parish | CAISTOR ST EDMUND, SOUTH NORFOLK, NORFOLK |
Map
Full Description
Some of these cropmarks were previously recorded under NHER 28456.
March 2009. Norfolk NMP.
The cropmarks of enclosures, boundaries and fields of probable Roman date are visible on aerial photographs (S1-S5) to either side of a main Roman road (NHER 30288) leading to the Roman town of Venta Icenorum (NHER 9786) from the southeast. The site is centred on TG 2350 0315. These enclosures and fields are aligned either parallel or perpendicular to the Roman road, which runs from the Roman town towards Stoke Holy Cross to the southeast), and are likely to also be Roman in date. The boundaries also follow the general layout of the triple-ditch defences to the north (NHER 52202). It is not clear whether the enclosures relate to further areas of the extramural settlement of the town, or whether they relate to agricultural enclosures or fields. The cluster of pits in the area of TG 2342 0313 (S1-S3) could feasibly relate to areas of settlement or activity. The potentially high-subdivided area at TG 2335 0308 (S1, S4-S5) may also indicate an area of occupation, although it is feasible the ditches relate to more than one phase of land division. A fourth century AD coin was found within the general proximity of these cropmarks (NHER 22078) and approximately half of the Roman coins found in this vicinity are also of fourth century AD date (NHER 28456), although given the density of Roman activity in this area, this cannot convincingly be used to date these cropmarks specifically. It is worth noting that these enclosures and boundaries follow the same alignment as an enclosed area surrounding the possible Roman temple to the south of the town (NHER 52209-10). It is possible that all of these parts of the town date to a single phase of development around the southwestern part of the town.
S. Horlock (NMP), 23 March 2009
Associated Sources (5)
- <S1> SNF74116 Aerial Photograph: CUCAP. 1971. CUCAP (BGS53-4) 22-JUL-1971.
- <S2> SNF74125 Aerial Photograph: Edwards, D.. 1992. NHER TG 2303AHA-B (NLA 307/GKX15) 06-JUN-1992.
- <S3> SNF74110 Vertical Aerial Photograph: Ordnance Survey. 1992. OS/92336 133-4 11-JUN-1992 (NMR).
- <S4> SNF74111 Aerial Photograph: Edwards, D.. 1996. NHER TG 2303AQW (NLA 361/JBA3) 14-JUN-1996.
- <S5> SNF74118 Aerial Photograph: Ordnance Survey. 1996. OS/96247 160-2 22-JUL-1996 (NMR).
Site and Feature Types and Periods (14)
- BOUNDARY DITCH (Unknown date)
- DITCH (Unknown date)
- FIELD BOUNDARY? (Unknown date)
- PIT (Unknown date)
- RECTANGULAR ENCLOSURE (Unknown date)
- RECTILINEAR ENCLOSURE? (Unknown date)
- SETTLEMENT? (Unknown date)
- BOUNDARY DITCH (Roman - 43 AD? to 409 AD?)
- DITCH (Roman - 43 AD? to 409 AD?)
- FIELD BOUNDARY? (Roman - 43 AD? to 409 AD?)
- PIT (Roman - 43 AD? to 409 AD?)
- RECTANGULAR ENCLOSURE (Roman - 43 AD? to 409 AD?)
- RECTILINEAR ENCLOSURE? (Roman - 43 AD? to 409 AD?)
- SETTLEMENT? (Roman - 43 AD? to 409 AD?)
Object Types (0)
Related NHER Records (0)
Record last edited
Nov 19 2024 11:09AM