NHER 57922 (Monument record) - Roman, medieval and undated remains

The Norfolk Heritage Explorer is a filtered version of the Norfolk HER intended for casual research. Please to consult the full record.

See also further .

Summary

Archaeological work between 2010 and 2011 revealed a significant concentration of remains at the western edge of this site, the majority of which appear to have been associated with Roman and early medieval phases of activity. The potential of the site had been demonstrated by an initial geophysical survey undertaken in 2010, which revealed a cluster of linear anomalies at the western edge of the western field. These appeared to represent a group of enclosures and were potentially associated with various discrete anomalies recorded in this area. Subsequent trial trenching in 2011 revealed numerous pits and ditches in this part of the site, a number of which were of probable Roman date. The dating of the possible enclosures was though complicated by the fact that several of the potentially associated ditches produced Saxo-Norman and early medieval pottery. Although several other clusters of pits and ditches were recorded elsewhere across the two fields these remains were mostly undated. A further phase of archaeological evaluation in 2022 saw the excavation of several additional trenches at the northern end of the eastern field, where only sparse remains had previously been recorded. This work had largely negative results with only a single undated ditch recorded.

Protected Status/Designation

  • None recorded

Location

Map sheet TG20SW
Civil Parish STOKE HOLY CROSS, SOUTH NORFOLK, NORFOLK
Civil Parish SWARDESTON, SOUTH NORFOLK, NORFOLK

Map

2010. Geophysical Survey.
Magnetometer survey of two proposed quarry extension areas.
This survey identified a dense cluster of linear anomalies close to the western edge of the western field, at TG 2127 0221. These east-to-west and north-to-south aligned anomalies appear to represent a group of enclosures and are potentially related to various more discrete responses recorded in this part of the site.
Also of potential archaeological interest are a group of linear and discrete anomalies recorded in the south-west corner of the western field and groups of discrete anomalies identified in the northernmost part of the eastern field.
Although elements of three cropmark groups are mapped in the western field (NHERs 9750, 52069 and 52071) these is little correspondence between this evidence and the results of the geophysical survey. No cropmarks have been recorded at the location of the main cluster of geophysical anomalies and only one of those mapped elsewhere in this field coincides with a potentially related geophysical anomaly (a north-to-south aligned linear cropmark in the south-west corner of the western field that is part of the small group recorded as NHER 9750).
Report awaited (details from report on 2011 trial trenching).
P. Watkins (HES), 23 January 2023.

August-October 2011. Trial Trenching.
Evaluation of two proposed aggregate extraction areas (Fields 3 and 4; Trenches 33-58).
The 26 trenches excavated in these two fields revealed a range of linear and discrete features. These included a particular concentration of features in the westernmost part of the western field (Field 3), in the area where the preceding geophysical survey had identified a group of probable enclosures and other potentially associated remains. Several pits and a number of the ditches recorded in this part of the site produced small quantities of Roman pottery, including several possible early Roman, transitional sherds. The situation is though complicated by the fact that two east-to-west aligned ditches and one north-to-south aligned ditch at this location were of probable medieval date, with the later clearly corresponding with one of the main geophysical anomalies. These features were potentially associated with activity during the earlier part of the medieval period, the pottery recovered being predominantly of Saxo-Norman and early medieval date.
Other notable features included a group of three north-north-east to south-south-west aligned ditches in the south-west corner of the site. Two of these features corresponded with previously recorded cropmarks that are part of a group that potentially relates to the site of the Humbleyard Hundred moot (NHER 9750). The third ditch lay to the east and coincided with a boundary depicted on the Swardeston tithe map of 1847 (S1), which appears to have enclosed the former moot site. Unfortunately none of these ditches produced any dating evidence.
Various other ditches, pits and possible post-holes were identified across the remainder of the two fields, with several notable concentrations present in central part of the site. Dating evidence was generally very sparce, although a number of features did produced small quantities of Roman pottery. No post-Roman material was recovered away from the main group of features and evidence for pre-Roman activity was largely limited to an irregular pit at the eastern end of the site that contained two handmade pottery sherds of Late Bronze Age/Iron Age date. It is also notable that many of the ditches scattered across the two fields were aligned north-west to south-east or north-east to south-west – i.e. orientated very differently to both the medieval ditches and more recent former and extant field boundaries.
See report (S2) for further details. The results of this work are also summarised in (S3).
An archive associated with this work has been deposited with Norwich Castle Museum (NWHCM : 2011.554).
The results of work in Field 5 to the south are now recorded separately under NHER 66663. See NHERs 9749, 37650 and 66386 for results of work in Fields 1 and 2.
Amended by P. Watkins (HES), 25 January 2023.

May 2018. Desk-based Assessment.
Environmental Impact Assessment of the potential impacts of the proposed Hornsea Project Three offshore wind farm on the historic environment. This study incorporated the results of an initial walkover survey and the first phases of geophysical survey.
See relevant chapter of Environmental Statement and associated appendices for further detail (S4).
P. Watkins (HES), 26 January 2023.

February-June 2022. Trial Trenching.
Evaluation of site on proposed route of Hornsea Project Three offshore wind farm onshore cable.
This work saw the excavation of seven trenches in the northern half of the eastern field (P3TT35; Trenches 1304-1310).
An undated east-to-west aligned ditch was the only feature recorded.
Information from draft report. Final version awaited.
P. Watkins (HES), 26 January 2023.

  • <S1> Map: Drane, W.. 1847. Swardeston Tithe map..
  • <S2> Unpublished Contractor Report: McNicoll-Norbury, J. and McNicol, D. 2012. Mangreen Quarry, Swardeston, Norfolk. Archaeological Evaluation. Headland Archaeology. MQSN11.
  • <S3> Article in Serial: Gurney, D. 2012. Excavations and Surveys in Norfolk in 2011. Norfolk Archaeology. Vol XLVI Pt III pp 421-428. p 428.
  • <S4> Unpublished Contractor Report: [anonymous]. 2018. Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm. Environmental Statement: Volume 3, Chapter 5 - Historic Environment. RPS Group.
  • CORE (Prehistoric - 1000000 BC to 42 AD)
  • DEBITAGE (Prehistoric - 1000000 BC to 42 AD)
  • END SCRAPER (Prehistoric - 1000000 BC to 42 AD)
  • FLAKE (Prehistoric - 1000000 BC to 42 AD)
  • RETOUCHED FLAKE (Prehistoric - 1000000 BC to 42 AD)
  • POT (Late Bronze Age to Early Iron Age - 1000 BC to 401 BC)
  • ANIMAL REMAINS (Unknown date)
  • PLANT REMAINS (Unknown date)
  • ANIMAL REMAINS (Roman - 43 AD? to 409 AD?)
  • BRICK (Roman - 43 AD to 409 AD)
  • BUILDING MATERIAL (Roman - 43 AD to 409 AD)
  • POT (Roman - 43 AD to 409 AD)
  • UNIDENTIFIED OBJECT (Roman - 43 AD? to 409 AD?)
  • POT (Late Saxon - 851 AD to 1065 AD)
  • POT (Late Saxon to Medieval - 901 AD to 1166 AD)
  • POT (Medieval - 1066 AD to 1539 AD)

Related NHER Records (0)

Record last edited

Jan 26 2023 10:40AM

Comments and Feedback

Your feedback is welcome; if you can provide any new information about this record, please contact the Norfolk Historic Environment Record.